¥ 0.00

购物车里没有产品

【英】黑蜂,一个急需保护的濒危物种

THE DARK BEE, AN INCREASINGLY RARE TREASURE THAT NEEDS URGENT PROTECTION

In addition to the many factors that are decimating bee colonies throughout the world, the dark bees, Western and Northern Europe’s local bees, are confronted with demands of short-term profitability that favour importation of bees often more fragile and unsuitable for our territories. It is urgent we protect them.

CATÉGORIES : DÉPÊCHES

DATE : 9 DÉCEMBRE 2015

A wonder of adaptation

Lively, frugal and resistant, dark bees have been present from the Pyrenees to Scandinavia for about a million years. Black-brown in colour, they are bigger and darker than other European subspecies, with a particularly large and voluminous abdomen. Their trunk is relatively short and their many silks (hairs) make them excellent collectors and spreaders of pollen, thus ensuring the survival of many wild plants and contributing to the yields and the quality of a large part of agricultural production.

The genus Apis comprises four groups of species, including Apis mellifera, or “honey-bearing bee”, that is found in Europe especially. It came from the East about a million years ago and has produced four main evolutionary lines. The dark bee, or Apis mellifera mellifera, is therefore a subspecies of one of these lines.

Particularly well adapted to the European climate, these local bees are more resistant to disease and its workers are known for their longevity. They are able to cope with extreme winter conditions by reducing the size of their colony and consuming their honey reserves sparingly, a regulatory process that increases their chances of survival.

Wild or domestic?

Social bees, dark or otherwise, have an uncertain status, somewhere between domestic and wild. On one hand, they feed themselves, adapt to external conditions and do not need human protection. On the other hand, they are forced to live in a shelter built by a beekeeper, who becomes their owner and can now control their reproduction.

In the past, domesticated bees could become wild again during swarming, when the queen left the hive with half its inhabitants to start a new swarm, and inversely, they could revert to being domestic again by moving from a natural cavity to the hive. With the current deteriorated ecological conditions, there are fewer natural swarms and they no longer last as long as they used to. Most of all, beekeeping practices have evolved and now aim to reduce swarming by controlling reproduction, with grafting (transfer of larvae), artificial insemination or queen rearing. Bees have become an increasingly domesticated species.

Dark bees can be seen as both wild and domestic, although in view of the evolution of the species and their behaviour, they should be considered wild animals. Especially since they haven’t been the subject of intensive breeding like other varieties of bees modified by humans for increased productivity. This lack of official categorisation is a problem because only wild species can legally be recognized as a “threatened species”. However, dark bees are in fact a subspecies threatened in France for several reasons.

The story of a future extinction?

Over the past twenty years, bees have disappeared massively all over the world. In the most affected beehives, beekeepers record up to 90% losses (dead bees, those unable to produce honey or who never come back). This is called “bee colony collapse disorder”. In Europe, annual mortality rates between 2012 and 2014 were around 23% on average1, compared to 5% to 10% natural mortality. What is causing this? Several factors, and their combined effects: pesticides, neonicotinoids in particular, loss of biodiversity linked to intensive industrial agriculture, viruses, parasites such as varroa, fungi such as Nosema cerranae, Asian hornet, etc.

In addition to these factors that affect all pollinators, there are specific threats to the dark bees: a poor reputation and the massive importation of non-local swarms of bees.

A bad reputation

The use of dark bees by beekeepers has significantly declined because they are perceived as being aggressive and producing little honey. It’s true that dark bees aren’t docile bees. To some, their ability to defend themselves and their responsiveness to stress, are even considered an advantage as it forces beekeepers to adopt practices that respect their nature. Scientists have demonstrated that actually it is mainly hybrid bees, resulting from crossbreeding between imported bees and dark bees, that are aggressive and difficult to handle. As for their supposedly low « yield », experts argue that their frugality largely compensate for this, as well as the low number of interventions required and their regularity, as dark foragers also work in bad weather and are more efficient during early and late blooms.

Massive import of swarms

Due to their reputation as nervous and unproductive bees, and in the absence of a local market for dark bees, many professional beekeepers have resorted to importing subspecies with higher short-term yields: Italian bees (Apis mellifera ligustica), Caucasian bees (Apis mellifera caucasica), the Buckfast, a strain resulting from multiple cross-breedings made by a monk in the abbey of the same name.

From a genetic point of view, there are no European legal measures regulating these imports. Some countries, notably Italy, whose bees are the most widely used in the world for beekeeping, have no interest in such legislation.

Hybridisation, or crossbreeding resulting from these imports, however, are contributing to weakening local subspecies. Crossbred with bees that are less autonomous and adapted to the environment, these hybrid bees are weaker and require more care and maintenance. In the long run, these mixed bees may no longer have the initial characteristics of the imported bees (docility and yield), nor the resistance capacities that the dark bees have.

Why protect dark bees?

  • Heritage value

This subspecies has been here for a million years; it’s a genetic heritage that must be preserved and transmitted to future generations and all the actors in the agricultural sector.

  • Ecological value

Pollinators are not interchangeable: they do not live in the same environment or at the same time of the year and they forge different flowers depending on the length of their trunk. As they are more adapted to the local climate, dark bees are likely to ensure a more constant, regular and varied pollination than imported subspecies.

  • Economic value

More resistant and longer-lasting, dark bees require less maintenance from beekeepers and provide a more regular honey production. They are suitable for sedentary beekeeping and can pollinate their environment and cultures all year round.

How to protect dark bees?

  • By accelerating an agricultural transition towards a European model that no longer relies on pesticides and chemical fertilizers but promotes biodiversity and viability for farmers.
  • By promoting the qualities of dark bees to a wide audience, public authorities and beekeepers.
  • By encouraging queen rearing and local swarm production among professionals.
  • By rethinking beekeeping cost-effectiveness dogmas and conducting studies on the profitability (added value per colony) of a beekeeping system that is based on dark bees compared to an institutionalised beekeeping system based on other bees.
  • By encouraging beekeeping practices that respect their indocile nature. Some beekeepers are very attached to their qualities as wild animals and would rather avoid any selection made for the needs of a productivist beekeeping system based on strategies to increase yields.
  • By creating black bee conservatories, like the about 40 that exist today in Europe, with a defined area within which bee colonies are protected with respect for their species: no transhumance (hives are not moved), no over-feeding (bees are fed with sweet syrups only when necessary and at the same level of what is collected only), and no import of non local bees.  In December 2015, twelve conservatories in France created FEdCAN, the European Federation of Dark Bee Conservatories, with the support of POLLINIS and Lionel Garnery, researcher at CNRS and a specialist in dark bee genetics.
  • By giving these conservation areas an official existence, by legally protecting their efforts and work, by imposing operating rules that respect local bees, by providing dissuasive sanctions for the introduction of non-indigenous bees into these conservatories. A European coalition of researchers, organizations and citizens have decided to put pressure on the European Commission and Member States of the European Union to obtain such urgent safeguard measures.
谢谢您的支持!
明德影像
明德影像
明德影像是一座人文档案馆,线下资料馆坐落于地扪书院,致力于数字档案保存与公共教育研究

最新文章

临时影院|「我日听夜听,血中流淌着音乐」乐土浮世录,屋顶上的小提琴手,愤怒的葡萄,红菱艳,音魂掠影,盛夏…

乐器是灵魂弹出来的,音乐与他人共有。本周,临时影院围绕着「音乐」或者说是「创作」的主题,着重推荐了六部影片

《文明》BBC 1969年系列纪录片中英字幕 09

BBC“电视史上的里程碑”,当代艺术历史最具雄心壮志的纪录片拍摄工作,由著名艺术历史学家克拉克爵士担任编剧与主持,探讨西欧文明,而爵士更在本片中界定了人类文明发展中的几个重要阶段。

《文明》BBC 1969年系列纪录片中英字幕 08

BBC“电视史上的里程碑”,当代艺术历史最具雄心壮志的纪录片拍摄工作,由著名艺术历史学家克拉克爵士担任编剧与主持,探讨西欧文明,而爵士更在本片中界定了人类文明发展中的几个重要阶段。

《文明》BBC 1969年系列纪录片中英字幕 07

BBC“电视史上的里程碑”,当代艺术历史最具雄心壮志的纪录片拍摄工作,由著名艺术历史学家克拉克爵士担任编剧与主持,探讨西欧文明,而爵士更在本片中界定了人类文明发展中的几个重要阶段。

《文明》BBC 1969年系列纪录片中英字幕 06

BBC“电视史上的里程碑”,当代艺术历史最具雄心壮志的纪录片拍摄工作,由著名艺术历史学家克拉克爵士担任编剧与主持,探讨西欧文明,而爵士更在本片中界定了人类文明发展中的几个重要阶段。

相关文章

更多

电影私塾 | 蜂蜜的故事

央厨房是资料馆全新的系列活动,将聚焦于饮食文化,结合读书会与纪录片放映,和大家一起学习有关食物的文化与科学。

蜜蜂的历史与象征

中国最早有关蜜蜂的记载,见于《诗经.周颂.小毖》: “其予非蜂,自求辛蜇”,大意为不要轻视微小的草和细蜂,受毒被螫才知道烦恼.背景是周成王平定管叔、蔡叔、武庚之乱后创作的一首自我规诫、自我戒勉的诗。

东方蜜蜂与瓦螨

東方蜜蜂(學名:Apis cerana),蜜蜂屬下的一個蜜蜂種。瓦蟎(學名:Varroa destructor),又稱狄斯瓦蟎、蜂蟹蟎,是蜜蜂的体外寄生虫

明德译介 | 蜂群及其组织

蜜蜂是群居性昆虫,这意味着它们共同生活在一个组织良好的大型家庭群体中。群居昆虫是高度进化的昆虫,它们从事多种独居昆虫无法完成的复杂任务。沟通、复杂的巢穴建造、环境控制、防御和分工是蜜蜂已经发展到在社会群体中成功存在的其中一些行为。这些的行为使社会性昆虫,特别是蜜蜂,成为地球上最让人著迷的生物之一。

沙特阿拉伯将在2020年前禁止进口外国蜜蜂

沙特阿拉伯上周决定在未来三年内实施外国蜜蜂进口禁令。 环境、水和农业部长Abdul Rahman Al-Fadli针对进口蜜蜂对当地菌种造成的威胁采取了行动。 养蜂人受到了进口蜜蜂带来的许多问题的威胁。最大的风险之一是杂交繁殖。如果进口蜜蜂与本地蜜蜂交配,就会玷污纯度。养蜂人担心,如果杂交继续下去,原来的品种可能会灭绝。

明德译介 |《蜂蜜之地》:“落后”的蜂蜜涂层

把“落后”描述为一个迷人的道德故事是不对的。自从一个世纪前罗伯特·弗莱厄蒂制作“纪录片”《北方的纳努克》以来,它就一直是错误的。某种程度上,《蜂蜜之地》就是21 世纪纳努克:用现代包装弗莱厄蒂的方法,甚至让不会说当地语言的电影人来拍摄他们。